Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732566›Full record

ArticleRevista Cuidarte

Predictors associated with ICU nursing workload in a sample of records collected before and during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic: An analytical study.

Diana Isabel Cáceres Rivera, Luis Alberto López-Romero, Judy Paola Martínez Patiño, Claudia Consuelo Torres Contreras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diana Isabel Cáceres RiveraFacultad de Enfermería, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia. Doctora en Biomedicina. Bucaramanga, Colombia. Email: dianai.caceres@ucc.edu.co Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia Bucaramanga Colombia dianai.caceres@ucc.edu.co.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4751-6173
Luis Alberto López-RomeroFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga-UNAB. Magister en Epidemiología. Doctorado en Metodología de la Investigación Biomédica y Salud Pública. Bucaramanga, Colombia. E-mail: alberlop60@gmail.com Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga-UNAB Bucaramanga Colombia alberlop60@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7698-7900
Judy Paola Martínez PatiñoUniversidad de Santander UDES. Maestría en gestión de servicios de salud. Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia. E-mail: judy-147@hotmail.com Universidad de Santander UDES Bucaramanga Colombia judy-147@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9075-3013
Claudia Consuelo Torres ContrerasUniversidad de Santander. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas y de la Salud. Instituto de Investigación Masira, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia. E-mail: clau.torres@mail.udes.edu.co Universidad de Santander Bucaramanga Colombia clau.torres@mail.udes.edu.co.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7064-9380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, the workload of nursing professionals in intensive care units (ICUs) has been described. Identifying associated factors may contribute to improving nursing care planning. Objective: To determine predictors associated with nursing workload in ICU settings using a sample of records collected before and during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: This was an analytical cross-sectional study. A total of 97 ICU patient records were included. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed using robust linear regression, with the primary outcome being workload measured with the Nursing Activities Score (NAS). Results: The mean age was 57.67 ± 17.78 years, and 68.04% (n=66) were men. Statistically significant differences were observed between the pre-pandemic period and the first peak of the pandemic for variables such as disease category, ICU type, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and number of nurses (p<0.001). A difference in median NAS values was observed, with 60.85 (Q1-Q3: 51.8-68.25) during the pre-pandemic period, compared with 183.40 (Q1-Q3: 149.30-204.40) during the first peak of the pandemic (p=0.001). Discussion: The workload levels identified in this study are consistent with those reported in similar studies. However, the specific scenario examined has scarcely been described in the existing literature. Conclusion: The pandemic increased the nursing staff's workload threefold. A weak, direct linear correlation was identified between workload and SOFA score. The pandemic year and the presence of cardiopulmonary conditions were identified as workload predictors.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical CareNursingWorkload

Identifiers

PMID41732566
PMCPMC12858413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.