ReviewEco-Environment & Health2026
Non-targeted screening of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: Advanced methods, challenges, and environmental health.
Review in Eco-Environment & Health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a class of synthetic fluorine-containing organic compounds, pose a serious threat to the ecological environment and human health due to their persistence, bioaccumulation, and extensive toxicity. Non-targeted screening (NTS) is a key method for identifying and determining unknown PFAS, which is crucial to the understanding of their exposure pathway and health risks. Hence, this review focuses on NTS techniques for PFAS in the environment. Firstly, high-resolution mass spectrometry and ion mobility innovations enabling novel PFAS/isomer identification are evaluated. Afterwards, pretreatment optimization (e.g., solid-phase extraction and emerging adsorbents) is summarized by analyzing the advantages of each method and the challenges posed by the limited datasets, while also outlining their applicable scenarios. Analytical challenges from structural complexity (short-chain substitutes and ether-based fluorine-modulated polymers) and matrix effects are discussed. Lastly, practical implications for environmental health and the future development potential of NTS technologies for PFAS are presented. Overall, this review proposes a science-based framework for monitoring and regulatory prioritization, with the expectation of supporting PFAS management and mitigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.