ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Pulsation-related motion artifact of the external iliac artery mimicking localized dissection: An unexpected finding.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced CT is widely used for the evaluation of acute aortic dissection, but non-ECG-gated studies may still be affected by motion artifacts that mimic true vascular pathology. We report a woman in her forties who presented with right back pain. Non-ECG-gated contrast-enhanced CT demonstrated a discontinuous linear finding in the right external iliac artery, suggestive of a localized dissection. Follow-up CT performed 3 weeks later showed a similar appearance. Cine MRI subsequently revealed marked pulsatile motion of the right external iliac artery with approximately 6-mm displacement, resulting in compression and deformation of the adjacent external iliac vein. These findings confirmed that the CT abnormality represented a pulsation-induced motion artifact rather than true dissection. Although advances in CT technology have reduced motion artifacts, they may still occur in vessels with substantial pulsatile mobility. When such artifacts are suspected, complementary imaging-such as ultrasound, cine MRI, or ECG-gated CT-can facilitate accurate diagnosis and prevent unnecessary intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.