ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Predicting complications in emergency department patients with acute coronary syndrome - Existing risk scores versus a new logistic regression model.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03421873 (Effectiveness and Safety of a Clinical Assessment and 0h/1h Troponin Rule-Out Protocol), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness and Safety of a Clinical Assessment and 0h/1h Troponin Rule-Out Protocol
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are often admitted to monitored wards due to the risk of complications. Several risk prediction scores exist, but their use in the emergency department (ED) is limited. We aimed to compare the ability of existing risk scores with a new logistic regression model in predicting complications in ACS patients. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data from the ESC TROP trial (NCT03421873), including ACS patients from five EDs in Region Skåne, Sweden (2017-2018). Complications were identified via diagnosis and/or intervention codes and manual chart review. GRACE, GRACE FFE, TIMI, HEART, ACTION ICU, and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were calculated. A new logistic regression model was developed, and its predictive performance was assessed using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) and a net reclassification improvement analysis (NRI). Results: Among 2223 ACS patients, 164 (7.4%) experienced complications. Independent predictors for complications included age, STEMI, troponin and lactate at arrival, shock index, Killip class, and new ECG changes. The logistic regression model's AUROC 0.84 (95% CI 0.80-0.88) outperformed all known risk scores: GRACE FFE 0.79 (0.75-0.84), ACTION ICU 0.77 (0.72-0.82), GRACE 0.76 (0.70-0.81), TIMI 0.74 (0.68-0.79), HEART 0.69 (0.64-0.74), and CHA₂DS₂-VASc 0.64 (0.59-0.69). Logistic regression improved reclassification of non-events, with a positive non-event NRI compared with all other scores. Conclusions: Serious complications occurred in 7% of ACS patients. A logistic regression model based on simple ED variables showed excellent predictive performance, surpassing existing risk scores. Improved risk stratification may optimize resource allocation while maintaining patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.