ArticleJSES international2026
Level of competition influences overhead athletes' shoulder internal rotation range of motion in the side-lying position.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A common impairment present in overhead athletes is decreased internal rotation (IR) range of motion (ROM). The supine position has typically been utilized for measuring IR ROM, but a side-lying position has demonstrated better reliability. There is, however, a paucity of reported values for this side-lying position in overhead athletes, as well as any impact on IR ROM across levels of athletic competition. Hypotheses for this study were: (1) dominant shoulder IR ROM would significantly decrease as level of competition increased; (2) dominant and nondominant IR ROM would be significantly different between the 2 positions, with the side-lying position yielding the least amount of IR ROM; and (3) the dominant shoulder would have significantly less IR ROM than the nondominant shoulder for both positions. Methods: Two measurements of passive IR ROM on the dominant and nondominant shoulder were gathered in a side-lying and supine position in 176 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I (DI), III, and recreational overhead athletes. Results: The dominant shoulder mean IR ROM values for the side-lying and supine positions were 40.0° ± 10.1° and 54.5° ± 11.6°, respectively; paired Conclusion: The side-lying position yielded significantly smaller IR ROM values compared to the supine position. The average IR ROM for the side-lying position for the dominant and nondominant shoulder in asymptomatic overhead athletes was 40° and 53°, respectively. National Collegiate Athletic Association DI athletes had a significantly smaller dominant-shoulder side-lying IR ROM value of 35°.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.