Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732425›Full record

ArticleJSES international2026

Diagnostics of shoulder periprosthetic joint infections: a global survey.

Oscar Dorrestijn, Nick Smeitink, Eoghan T Hurley, Emilio Calvo, Jeppe Rasmussen, Hanna Björnsson, Robert Hudek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oscar DorrestijnDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Sint Maartens Clinic, Ubbergen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Nick SmeitinkDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eoghan T HurleyDuke University Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Durham, NC, USA.
Emilio CalvoShoulder and Elbow Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain.
Jeppe RasmussenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Region Hovedstaden, Denmark.
Hanna BjörnssonDepartment of Orthopedics Linköping University Hospital and Institution of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Östergötlands län, Sweden.
Robert HudekATOS Klinik Fleetinsel Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic joint infections is challenging. Several diagnostic tests are available, but their predictive value varies and is often poor. The aims of this study were to assess internationally how shoulder surgeons diagnose periprosthetic joint infections, and to investigate if there are intercollegiate and intercontinental differences. Methods: An online survey was designed for shoulder surgeons, incorporating questions regarding their utilization of various diagnostic tests and their level of professional experience. The survey was sent digitally to all members of the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and the Elbow, all European National Delegates, and 10 other Shoulder and Elbow societies worldwide. Results: Two hundred thirty-nine surveys were included in this study. The majority of the respondents (≥65%) routinely use at least 9 of different diagnostic tests as a workup for a shoulder periprosthetic joint infections: blood testing (C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate), pre-revision synovial fluid aspiration (culture, white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage), intraoperative synovial fluid aspiration (culture), pre-revision tissue biopsy for culture, and tissue biopsy for culture during revision surgery. Significantly more cultures were taken by respondents who perform fewer revisions ( Conclusion: The majority of those who responded to the survey use at least 9 different tests to diagnose shoulder periprosthetic joint infections. Respondents who perform fewer revisions take more cultures, and are less likely to rely solely on these results, compared to surgeons who perform more revisions. There are several intercontinental differences in the use of diagnostic tests (within Europe and beyond).

Indexed as

DiagnosticsPeriprosthetic joint infectionsShoulderSurgeonsSurveyTests

Identifiers

PMID41732425
PMCPMC12925342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.