Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732390›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2026

Data-driven multiscale design of composite biomaterials: Integrating experiments, imaging, and computational modeling for biomedical engineering.

Kuanbing Chen, Yu Li, Ying Xuan, Maaz Khan, Xiaofeng Wang, Xin Zhang, Feng Guo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kuanbing ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Yu LiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Ying XuanDpartment of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Maaz KhanPakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology (PINSTECH), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Xiaofeng WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Tiexi District, No. 39 Huaxiang Road, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110000, People's Republic of China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001, People's Republic of China.
Feng GuoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Tiexi District, No. 39 Huaxiang Road, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Composite biomaterials are central to biomedical engineering, where implants and scaffolds must simultaneously meet mechanical, biological, and functional demands across length scales. This review outlines a data-driven multiscale design paradigm that unites experiments, three-dimensional imaging, and computational modelling. We present hierarchical architectures in natural tissues, such as bone, and their implications for stiffness, toughness, and damage tolerance, which inspire the design of synthetic composites. Then we discuss multiscale mechanical and physicochemical characterization, including nanoindentation, bulk mechanical tests, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), rheology, and

Indexed as

BiomaterialsComputer simulationImagingMachine learningThree-dimensionalTissue engineeringTissue scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID41732390
PMCPMC12925225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.