Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732355›Full record

ArticleData in brief2026

A curated dataset of multi-channel TV program schedules for optimization and benchmarking.

Kadri Sylejmani, Shefket Bylygbashi, Uran Lajçi, Zenun Kastrati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kadri SylejmaniFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Prishtina, Bregu i Diellit p.n, 10000 Prishtina, Kosova.
Shefket BylygbashiFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Prishtina, Bregu i Diellit p.n, 10000 Prishtina, Kosova.
Uran LajçiFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Prishtina, Bregu i Diellit p.n, 10000 Prishtina, Kosova.
Zenun KastratiDepartment of Informatics, Linnaeus University, Universitetsplatsen 1, 351 95, Växjö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a collection of 515 Smart TV scheduling instances from three public sources: IPTV EPG broadcast listings, EPG.PW program guides, and upcoming YouTube livestream schedules obtained through the YouTube Data API. The data were collected and processed using automated Python scripts that download program information, convert it into a standard format, and remove entries with missing or invalid time information. All times are recorded as minutes from the start of each scheduling period to ensure consistency across different sources. Each instance is stored as a JSON file with a consistent structure. Each file contains the scheduling period (start and end times), channel information, program time slots that don't overlap, program categories, and quality scores from 0 to 100 for each program. Instances also include two types of constraints: strict rules that specify which channels must be available during certain time windows, and flexible preferences that assign bonus points to programs airing at preferred times. All files are organized by data source and automatically checked for correctness. The dataset can be used for benchmarking optimization and constraint-based scheduling methods, comparing objective formulations with switching and termination penalties, testing algorithms under time-dependent feasibility constraints, and extracting instance features for dataset characterization and dimensionality-reduction workflows.

Indexed as

Broadcast planningConstraint satisfactionDimensionality reductionGenre compositionMetaheuristic searchPenalty functionsReal-world dataTime windows

Identifiers

PMID41732355
PMCPMC12925585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.