ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2026
Efficacy and safety of olopatadine-mometasone combination nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiac Safety of Intranasal Chlorpheniramine: An Exposure-Based Risk Assessment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis (AR) often experience a heavy clinical burden and require more medications to alleviate nasal symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSP301, a fixed-dose combination nasal spray containing olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate, in patients with seasonal AR (SAR). Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, moderate-to-severe SAR patients were assigned at a 1:1:1 ratio to receive intranasal GSP301, olopatadine hydrochloride (OLO), or mometasone furoate (MF) for 14 days. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the average A.M. and P.M. 12-hour reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS). Secondary endpoints included changes in the instantaneous TNSS (iTNSS), individual nasal symptoms, reflective total ocular symptom score (rTOSS), instantaneous total ocular symptom score (iTOSS), individual ocular symptoms, and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaire (RQLQ). Exploratory endpoints and adverse events were also analyzed. Results: Among the 534 subjects, the GSP301 group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the average rTNSS compared with the OLO group [posterior least square mean difference (LSMD) = -0.56; Conclusion: Compared with OLO and MF, GSP301 demonstrated superior efficacy, safety, and potential advantages in alleviating local inflammation in patients with moderate-to-severe SAR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.