ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Impact of US government funding freezes on the HIV response: findings from a rapid survey in 32 countries.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Documenting HIV service delivery and adoption of evidence-based practices in HIV care programs: A protocol for a cross-sectional survey of HIV clinics participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA).medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The Impact of the United States Foreign Aid Freeze on HIV Service Delivery in PEPFAR-Supported Countries: A Facility-Level Analysis of 2024-2025 Programme Data.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Scientific synergy between prophylactic and therapeutic HIV vaccines-prevention and cure.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- U.S. Funding Cuts and Health System Challenges in Community-Based HIV Programmes in Rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Ten high-priority areas for health policy research in 2026-2027.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: After the freezing of US foreign assistance in January 2025, the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) conducted a rapid survey among clinics and programs actively participating in the research consortium to assess the status of HIV-related service delivery in mid-2025. Methods: In June-July 2025, an online survey was distributed to 103 IeDEA-participating clinics/programs in 41 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Asia-Pacific. Survey domains included US funding-related disruptions in service delivery, medication availability, laboratory services, clinic operations, and attendant mitigation strategies. Responses were received from 76/103 (74%) clinics/programs in 32/41 (78%) countries. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize disruptions in HIV-related care and mitigation measures. Results: Almost half of responding sites reported disruptions in HIV-related services (47%) since January 2025, along with disruptions in medication availability (28%), laboratory services (34%), and non-research clinic operations (47%). Among those reporting disruptions in HIV-related services, only 14% reported that all disruptions were fully resolved at the time of the survey. Conclusion: Given anticipated reductions in global HIV funding, government- and community-led monitoring of HIV prevention and treatment services and care outcomes are critical for informing national responses and averting reversal of progress in ending the epidemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.