ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Long-term effect of discontinuing anticholinesterase treatment on cognitive decline and mortality in Alzheimer's disease in France: a quasi-experiment and target trial emulation study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synthesis and Biological Profiling of New 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydrobenzo[Biomolecules · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In 2018, France withdrew reimbursement for cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) in Alzheimer's disease, citing modest efficacy, lack of long-term benefit, and safety concerns. This policy shift provided a unique opportunity to assess ChEI effectiveness in real-world settings, by evaluating, among patients treated with ChEI between 01/08/2017 and 01/08/2018, the impact of treatment discontinuation on cognitive decline (MMSE score) and survival. Methods: Using the French National Alzheimer's Database (BNA) and Meotis databases, we emulated a pragmatic, intention-to-treat trial comparing patients who discontinued ChEIs after delisting to those who continued treatment, under quasi-experimental conditions. To model cognitive trajectories, we used the inverse probability treatment-weighted (IPTW) cohort and applied mixed-effects models with random intercepts across all follow-up visits. Survival was estimated with a pooled logistic regression including treatment group, follow-up time, and an interaction between treatment and time. Findings: The mean difference in MMSE decline between discontinuers and continuers after one year was 0·97 points (95% CI 0·68-1·27, Interpretation: Our findings confirm and extend prior trials by demonstrating the sustained cognitive benefits of ChEIs in a real-world setting. While acknowledging the limitations associated with its retrospective nature, our study argues for reconsidering the 2018 delisting decision, as ChEIs remain safe and clinically relevant for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.