ReviewPublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
Global prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among restaurant workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To gain a comprehensive understanding of the prevalence of MSSs among restaurant workers, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. The primary objective was to determine the magnitude of this issue and to provide valuable insights for the development and implementation of effective prevention and intervention strategies. Study design: systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive search of multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. A random-effects model was employed for the meta-analysis, and heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I Results: Following the completing the stages of screening, selection, and evaluation of the quality of the studies, 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that The pooled prevalence of MSSs among restaurant workers was 67.01% (95% CI: 57.90-76.12, I2 = 98.2%, P < 0.001). The highest and lowest prevalence rates are related to the low back with a rate of 50.78% (95% CI: 39.45-62.11, I2 = 98.4%, P < 0.001) and hip/thigh with a rate of 19.05% (95% CI: 10.24-27.87, I2 = 98.2%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The relatively high occurrence of MSSs within the restaurant industry necessitates the implementation of preventive measures, including ergonomic interventions, to mitigate their adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.