ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Beyond a century of discovery: the global and persistent burden of underdiagnosis in von Willebrand disease.
Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persistent Gingival Bleeding After Scaling: A Diagnostic Clue to von Willebrand Disease.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- von Willebrand disease: an illustrated review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Exploratory Claims-Based Assessment of Diagnosed and Potentially Undiagnosed von Willebrand Disease in Japan.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In February 2026, von Willebrand disease (VWD) will mark a century since its first description by Dr Erik Adolf von Willebrand. VWD is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and characterized predominantly by mucocutaneous bleeding. Despite remarkable advances in understanding its biology, diagnostic assays, genetics, and treatment, VWD remains widely underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed. Population-based studies estimate a prevalence between 0.8% and 1.6%, with 1 in 1000 individuals carry clinically significant VWD phenotypes, but global registry-reported prevalence averages only 25.6 per million, highlighting a striking gap between expected and identified cases. Underdiagnosis is driven by low awareness among health care providers, clinical and laboratory heterogeneity, assay variability, limited access to specialized testing, and misclassification as other bleeding disorders. Although VWD affects both sexes equally, women and girls are disproportionately impacted, with up to 90% experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding, 30% to 50% facing postpartum hemorrhage, and many missing school or workdays due to bleeding. Median diagnostic delay in women can exceed 14 years, often with multiple severe bleeding episodes prior to recognition. Disparities are particularly pronounced in low- and middle-income countries, where only severe cases are typically identified. Addressing these gaps requires global harmonization of diagnostic standards, increased awareness among health care providers, broader use of bleeding assessment tools, expanded laboratory capacity, and integration of sex-specific and precision medicine approaches. Coordinated policy, education, and awareness initiatives are essential to ensure early detection, equitable care, and optimal outcomes. The goal for the second century of VWD is that all patients are accurately diagnosed and appropriately treated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.