ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026
Identifying patient data that should be available in community pharmacies for statutory dispensing and providing clinical pharmacy services: A Delphi study.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Community pharmacy practice has evolved from dispensing and medication counseling towards clinical pharmacy services such as medication reviews to ensure rational pharmacotherapy. These functions require better access to patient data than are currently available in community pharmacies. This study aimed to identify and prioritize patient data that should be available in Finnish community pharmacies for 1) statutory dispensing, including medication counseling, and 2) clinical pharmacy services promoting rational pharmacotherapy. Materials and methods: This study applied a three-round Delphi survey with an expert panel of 20 clinical pharmacists. A consensus was formed using a preliminary list of patient data (39 items) important for managing major long-term diseases and related pharmacotherapies in outpatient care. The list was based on literature and research group's expertise. A consensus ≥80% was required. The responses were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: Most panelists ( Conclusion: Consensus was reached for a relatively large set of patient data items to be available in community pharmacies, especially for providing clinical pharmacy services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.