ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
One health rapid qualitative assessment: Exploring local governance gaps in Tanzania.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The One Health Approach (OHA) is globally recognized as essential for addressing complex health threats such as antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, translating national commitments into coordinated subnational practice remains a major governance challenge. This paper presents the OH Rapid Qualitative Assessment (OH-RQA) as a rapid, resource-efficient diagnostic tool for analyzing subnational implementation. Using five analytical dimensions (thinking, planning, working, sharing, and learning) the OH-RQA examines how practitioners and implementers at the local level understand and apply the OHA. We applied the OH-RQA in two Tanzanian regions in the context of AMR, collecting data through focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews with district officials in human, animal, and environmental sectors. Findings reveal persistent gaps between national OHA strategies and local governance practices, including limited cross-sectoral coordination, inconsistent awareness of national AMR priorities, and structural barriers to integrated action. Officers identified absent policy mandates, insufficient guidance from higher administrative levels, lack of training and incentives, and the exclusion of OHA from most job descriptions as key obstacles. By providing a scalable, structured, qualitative diagnostic framework focused on local practice, the OH-RQA supports targeted recommendations for strengthening subnational AMR governance. Beyond Tanzania, it offers a transferable approach for rapidly assessing OH implementation across diverse crisis governance contexts, including pandemic preparedness, climate adaptation, and cross-border health threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.