Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732288›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026

Development and formative evaluation of a follow-up checklist for patients who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer based on the Supportive Care Framework.

Xinxin Huang, Qingqiu Wu, Min Hu, Xinxin Zhang, Beibei Song, Qingqing Hong, Shaohua Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xinxin HuangSchool of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Qingqiu WuSchool of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Min HuSchool of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xinxin ZhangSchool of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Beibei SongSchool of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Qingqing HongSchool of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Shaohua HuThe First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Rectal cancer survivors who have undergone sphincter-preserving surgery (SPS) face complex challenges often under-addressed by surveillance-focused guidelines. Grounded in the Supportive Care Framework-which emphasizes meeting patients' holistic needs to improve outcomes-this study developed and evaluated a phase-specific follow-up checklist to standardize post-discharge management. Methods: Using a mixed-methods design, an item pool was generated from a literature review ( Results: Evidence synthesis highlighted gaps in physical function and psychosocial adaptation. Experts achieved high consensus, resulting in 52 items across four recovery phases. The checklist operationalizes tasks ranging from preventive stoma care and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) management to social reintegration. Formative evaluation confirmed clinical utility and face validity, with an average nurse completion time of 22.7 minutes. Conclusions: This theory-driven checklist complements surveillance guidelines by shifting focus to comprehensive survivorship care. It offers a structured workflow for the early detection of physical and psychosocial issues. Future research should prioritize multi-center psychometric validation and long-term effectiveness evaluation.

Indexed as

Delphi methodFollow-up checklistRectal cancerSphincter-preserving surgerySupportive care

Identifiers

PMID41732288
PMCPMC12925129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.