Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732284›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Urban forest plant diversity affects soil organic carbon by regulating functional genes in Nanning.

Wei Zhou, Zhao Wei, Ning Feng, Mi Luo, Bingpeng Qu, Qiren Luo, Jianbing Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei ZhouKey Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Ministry of Education, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China.
Zhao WeiSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China.
Ning FengSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China.
Mi LuoSchool of Geography and Planning, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China.
Bingpeng QuSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China.
Qiren LuoGuangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region State-owned Qipo Forest Farm, Nanning 530001, China.
Jianbing ZhangKey Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Ministry of Education, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban forests serve as reservoirs of soil organic carbon (SOC) within ecosystems and play a critical role in the carbon (C) cycle. However, the regulatory mechanisms underlying SOC dynamics across urbanization gradients in urban forests remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the interrelationships among plant diversity, SOC and its oxidation-stable fractions, and functional genes across an urbanization gradient encompassing an urban center (UC), subcenter, suburb, and exurb. Our findings revealed that urbanization significantly enhanced plant diversity and altered SOC dynamics. UC exhibited higher plant diversity and increased concentrations of active SOC fractions. Although urbanization did not significantly affect microbial α-diversity, it selectively enriched the relative abundance of specific taxa. C sequestration-related functional genes, particularly K15635 and K01965, were strongly associated with the regulation of SOC dynamics in the urban forest. Our findings underscore the importance of conserving diverse tree communities to enhance the C-sequestration function of urban forests.

Indexed as

ecologyenvironmental sciencenatural sciencesplant ecologysoil ecology

Identifiers

PMID41732284
PMCPMC12925049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.