ArticleAdvances in rehabilitation science and practice
The EQ-5D-5L and Minimal Important Change in Long COVID.
Article in Advances in rehabilitation science and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The EQ-5D-5L is the most commonly used patient-reported outcome measure in Long COVID (LC). Despite its frequent use, there have been few studies reporting LC-specific metrics to identify and interpret meaningful change. The aim of the study was therefore to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Minimal Important Difference (MID) measures for the EQ-5D-5L in LC. Methods: Data were collected from a national study (LOCOMOTION) evaluating LC services in the UK, involving participants completing the EQ-5D-5L on at least 2 occasions. The EQ-5D domains were categorised using Paretian classification of health states, and the probability of superiority was used to determine changes in health states over time. EQ-5D-5L profile scores were converted into health utilities using the UK-specific algorithm. The MCID was derived using 0.5 standard deviation and the MID by a 0.2 effect size. Results: A total of 423 people (283 females, 67%) with LC completed the EQ-5D at 2 time points (median time interval: 196 days). Most participants reported problems in at least 1 EQ-5D domain. Only around 25% of participants noted some improvement. The MCID estimates were 0.11 for the EQ-5D-5L and 10.6 for the EQ-5D-5L VAS. The MID for the EQ-5D-5L was 0.03. Some differences in the change metrics were observed depending on baseline health states and timing of the follow-up assessment. Conclusion: Long COVID specific estimates of the MCIDs and MIDs were derived for the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D VAS. The MCIDs will facilitate the evaluation and interpretation of meaningful change in patient health states in LC, both at the individual level and more broadly in health economic assessments of LC management, intervention and rehabilitation programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.