Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732188›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026

Reappraising TB preventive treatment in India: programmatic and ethical implications of subclinical tuberculosis in household contacts.

Saurav Basu, Atul Vashist, Shivani Chandra, Nandini Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saurav BasuDept. of Community Medicine, ESI-PGIMSR & ESIC Medical College, Joka, Kolkata, India.
Atul VashistDept. of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Bennett University, Greater Noida, India.
Shivani ChandraMinistry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, India.
Nandini SharmaDept. of Community Medicine, SGT University, Gurugram, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India's pursuit of Tuberculosis (TB) elimination is contingent on the rapid universal scale-up of TB Preventive Treatment (TPT) for household contacts. However, current strategies largely neglect the asymptomatic active (subclinical) TB stage in terms of standardized diagnosis and optimized management. Consequently, administering TPT to individuals with unrecognized subclinical TB constitutes inadequate therapy that provides no patient benefit, enables community transmission, and risks minimal chances of iatrogenic drug resistance-violating the fundamental ethical principle of non-maleficence. We examine the tension between utilitarian public health goals and individual biomedical ethics, arguing for a transition within the National TB Elimination Program (NTEP) toward a rights-based framework prioritizing the clinical safety of household contacts. Crucially, the NTEP must institutionalize robust health education for contacts regarding the persistent risk of progression for at least 24 months post-TPT completion, coupled with sustained clinical surveillance to mitigate delayed health-seeking behavior. Further, sustained investment in digital diagnostics and translational research apart from addressing implementation gaps in the private sector is paramount to making TPT safe, evidence-driven, and ethically responsible.

Indexed as

AMRLatent tuberculosisMedical ethicsScreeningTB preventive treatmentTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID41732188
PMCPMC12925466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.