ArticleDigital health
A comparison of customized GPTs and GPT-4o for self-medication knowledge: A feasibility study using the Japanese registered salesperson examination.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This feasibility study aimed to assess whether minimally customized large language models (LLMs) can achieve knowledge levels relevant for self-medication support by evaluating their performance on the Japanese Registered Salesperson Examination. Registered salespersons provide consumers with guidance on appropriate selection and safe use of over-the-counter drugs in Japan. We explored whether LLMs customized through simple reference materials upload, without requiring programming skills or advanced prompt engineering, could achieve comparable knowledge levels. Methods: We used the 2024 Registered Salesperson Examination in Japan as a benchmark dataset, comprising 838 text-only multiple-choice questions across five domains. We created customized GPTs by uploading the official guide for examination question development as a PDF file to GPT-4o, without additional prompts or instructions. Both GPT-4o and the customized GPTs were evaluated using a zero-shot approach with web-browsing capabilities disabled. Results: The overall accuracy was 78.40% for GPT-4o and 92.36% for the GPTs, with this difference being statistically significant ( Conclusion: This feasibility study demonstrates that minimal customization through reference materials upload can achieve performance improvements on knowledge-based assessments. However, examination performance represents only an indirect indicator of knowledge for self-medication support. Future research should evaluate LLMs performance in real-world case scenarios and assess practical utility and safety before implementation in consumer self-medication settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.