ArticleDigital health
SYNNER synthetic data generator framework.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Sharing medical data is hampered by technical, regulatory, and privacy challenges, including compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. However, existing data anonymization methods are error-prone or vulnerable to re-identification, and synthetic data generation approaches are limited. This study introduces SYNNER, a novel synthetic data generation framework that overcomes existing limitations, preserving data utility while ensuring privacy. Methods: We employ knowledge graph embeddings to encode data into a k-dimensional space, capturing complex relationships. For each entity, its nearest neighbors are identified, and their characteristics are used to generate a synthetic version that maintains statistical consistency. We evaluated SYNNER on seven publicly available datasets, measuring the preservation of original data signals and comparing macro-F1 scores across prediction tasks. A novel evaluation protocol for differential privacy was also introduced, simulating an adversarial attack to infer missing values. Results: The evaluation shows that SYNNER maintains an average of 83.2% of the signals from the original datasets. In predictive tasks, models trained on SYNNER-generated data achieved a proportional average macro-F1 score of 74.4%, comparable to those trained on the original data. The proposed evaluation protocol for differential privacy assesses whether synthetic datasets meet expected privacy standards and highlights potential risks of individual data point reconstruction. Conclusion: SYNNER provides a scalable and effective solution for generating synthetic data that maintains statistical fidelity. It overcomes the limitations of existing methods, providing a privacy-preserving solution for synthetic data generation and advancing research in sensitive domains such as healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.