ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2026
Risk factors for insufficient segmental lordosis at the fused level following posterior lumbar interbody fusion: Effect of change in segmental lordosis in the intraoperative prone position.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A decrease in segmental lordosis (SL) at the fused level (ΔSL < 0) following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has been identified as a contributing factor to early-onset adjacent segment disease. However, achieving sufficient SL can be challenging despite technical strategies such as optimized cage placement. This study aimed to identify risk factors for ΔSL < 0 following PLIF, with a particular focus on intraoperative prone SL. Methods: A total of 105 patients who underwent primary single-level PLIF at L4-5 for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis between 2017 and 2022 were included. Radiological evaluations included measurements of preoperative, intraoperative (prone position), and 1-week postoperative radiographs, as well as preoperative CT images. ΔSL-P was defined as the change in SL between preoperative standing and intraoperative prone positions. Patients were categorized into the ΔSL ≥ 0 and the ΔSL < 0 group. Patient demographics, preoperative radiological parameters, intraoperative SL, ΔSL-P, cage configuration, and the cage height-disc height ratio were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The ΔSL ≥ 0 group comprised 48 patients, while the ΔSL < 0 group included 57. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative standing SL (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.31, p = .033) and ΔSL-P (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53-0.82, p < .001) as significant risk factors for ΔSL < 0. Preoperative standing SL showed a significant negative correlation with ΔSL ( Conclusions: ΔSL-P was identified as the most significant risk factor for ΔSL < 0. A decrease in prone SL relative to the preoperative standing value may warrant careful attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.