ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2026
Blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: potential utility in clinical practice.
Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewBlood-based biomarkers (BBMs) for Alzheimer's disease are beginning to enter clinical practice. As this integration advances, it is essential to critically examine their strengths, limitations, and readiness for broader clinical application. RECENT
findingsEvidence increasingly supports the utility of BBMs for clinical management of Alzheimer's disease, with phosphorylated tau species, Aβ42/40 ratio, GFAP, and NfL among the most studied. Plasma p-tau forms have emerged as the most promising markers, showing strong correlations with amyloid plaque deposition and predictive value for disease progression. The WHO and the Global CEO Initiative have outlined minimum performance criteria for clinical use. While no BBM meets these benchmarks with a single cutpoint, adopting a two-cutpoint approach by introducing an intermediate category has enabled some assays to achieve the required accuracy. Several assays are now commercially available, and two have recently received FDA clearance to assist in confirming or ruling out amyloid-beta pathology. SUMMARY: BBMs could transform Alzheimer's disease diagnostics by enabling scalable, minimally invasive approaches for early detection and monitoring. As implementation advances, assay harmonization, assessment of demographic and physiological influences, and real-world validation across diverse populations remain essential to ensure reliability and equitable access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.