ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Benefits of Dual-Tasking on Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Benefits of Dual-Tasking on Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Attention plays a crucial role in maintaining precision and effectiveness in goal-directed actions. Although there is evidence that dividing attention across tasks impairs performance in various domains, the impact of attention on sensorimotor adaptation remains inconclusive, with some studies reporting deficits and others showing no effects. Because sensorimotor adaptation arises from the interaction of explicit and implicit processes, this discrepancy may reflect differential effects of attention on each process. Here, we investigate how divided attention influences implicit sensorimotor adaptation using an error-clamp paradigm, coupled with a random-dot kinematogram (RDK) motion coherence discrimination task. We also assessed whether the timing of the secondary task affects error processing during sensorimotor adaptation by presenting the RDK either during the outward movement (coinciding with error feedback) or the inward movement (following error feedback). We observed that attentional manipulation influenced implicit sensorimotor adaptation only when the RDK was presented on the outward movement, not the inward movement. Remarkably, implicit sensorimotor adaptation was enhanced when attention was divided, compared to when attention was focused entirely on the adaptation task. This suggests that implicit sensorimotor adaptation is sensitive to attentional demand, particularly during the time window where error feedback is received.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.