Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732111›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2026

Evaluating Open-Source Solutions for Computerized Inference of Infant Facial Affect.

Martin Lund Trinhammer, Ida Egmose, Marianne Thode Krogh, Anne Christine Stuart, Mette Skovgaard Væver, Sami Sebastian Brandt, Stella Graßhof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martin Lund TrinhammerAudio-Visual Computing, Section of Data Science, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen S, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1155-1970
Ida EgmoseCentre of Excellence in Early Intervention and Family Studies (CIF), Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Marianne Thode KroghCentre of Excellence in Early Intervention and Family Studies (CIF), Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8872-3243
Anne Christine StuartCentre of Excellence in Early Intervention and Family Studies (CIF), Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3829-9995
Mette Skovgaard VæverCentre of Excellence in Early Intervention and Family Studies (CIF), Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Sami Sebastian BrandtAudio-Visual Computing, Section of Data Science, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen S, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2141-9815
Stella GraßhofAudio-Visual Computing, Section of Data Science, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen S, Denmark.

Funding

DNRF P1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infant affect is often expressed through facial expressions, making this modality a key source of insight into the child's well-being and social functioning. Computational inference of infant affect could critically assist both researchers and clinicians working with infant development and mitigate the need for manual coding. While many studies have explored open-source solutions in the adult domain, only the commercial Baby FaceReader 9 exists for the infant domain. To address this gap, we utilize the recently proposed, open-source infant-native action unit (AU) detection library PyAFAR (Python-based Automated Facial Action Recognition) on a sample of 71 four-month-old infants, whose facial expressions were manually annotated frame-by-frame for three minutes according to the Infant Facial Affect (IFA) coding scheme. Using these AUs as features, we classify facial affect into negative, neutral, and positive using XGBoost and Bayesian filtering, both in a multiclass and a binary setup. Our results show that AUs estimates from PyAFAR, combined with an XGBoost classification model, can distinguish positive from neutral and positive from negative affect with AUC scores of 0.78 and 0.76, respectively. This performance is essentially on par with that reported in evaluation studies of the Baby FaceReader 9, when accounting for differences in study setup. Our work indicates that the area of infant facial affect is particularly well-suited to supervised learning, given the availability of two distinct, commensurable measurement schemes that underpin the same phenomenon. Finally, we discuss how future iterations of PyAFAR may benefit from including AUs that capture more variability around infant forehead and mouth opening.

Indexed as

AffectFacial ExpressionBayes TheoremBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansInfantMalecomputer visioninfant facial affectmachine learningopen‐source

Identifiers

PMID41732111
PMCPMC12930228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.