ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
Functional, Contextual, and Interventional Drivers of Formal Coercion in Acute Mental Health Units: A Feature Analysis.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perspectives and Experiences of People Receiving Care on a De-escalation Intervention to Reduce Restrictive Practices in Acute Mental Health Units.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimising formal coercion, such as seclusion, physical restraint, and forced medication, remains a global priority in acute mental health units. However, key drivers beyond individual-level features are poorly understood. This exploratory analysis was intended to identify the top functional, contextual, and interventional features linked to formal coercion in three Australian acute adult mental health inpatient units. Nested within a mixed concurrent control study, this feature analysis examined nurses' reports of 2955 de-escalation events over 324 days, from March 2024 to April 2025, including nurses' commentaries on the behavioural functions that triggered de-escalations. Fifteen inductively coded functional features were analysed alongside 15 contextual and 16 interventional features. Studied target variables included seclusion and physical restraint events and their durations, as-needed intramuscular psychotropic events, physical injury events, and Code Black activations. Features were analysed using bivariate statistics and machine learning techniques, including the Boruta algorithm for feature selection and random forest regressions for predictive modelling. Top drivers for the use of formal coercion included behavioural 'Responses to Challenging, Physical and External Stimuli,' incidents of self-harm, incidents directed towards nurses, and the application of specific de-escalation techniques. A hierarchy of behavioural functions is proposed as a by-product of this analysis. These findings provide nuanced insights into the drivers of formal coercion and the underlying value arrangements, as well as elevate the merit of ecological, bottom-up approaches in early warning signs work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.