Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41732075›Full record

ReviewClinical oral implants research2026

1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Single-Round Survey on Implant-Supported Fixed and Removable Prostheses.

Guo-Hao Lin, Franz J Strauss, Giulia Brunello, Charlotte Stilwell, Ronald E Jung, Ina Kopp, Frank Schwarz, Hom-Lay Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical oral implants research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guo-Hao LinDepartment of Orofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Franz J StraussClinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5832-7327
Giulia BrunelloDepartment of Oral Surgery, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1436-0085
Charlotte StilwellDivision of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6776-4927
Ronald E JungClinic of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2055-1320
Ina KoppAWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Frank SchwarzDepartment of Oral Surgery, Implantology and Oral Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5515-227X
Hom-Lay WangDepartment of Periodontics & Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4238-1799

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis single-round survey on prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla is one of four clinician surveys commissioned prior to the first Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines (GCCG). Within the GCCG aim of refining treatment protocols and enhancing patient care, this survey gathered expert insights into best practices, challenges, and treatment outcomes for these complex restorative procedures. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe 25-item survey was sent to 230 identified experts from 41 countries in October 2024. Participation in the survey was voluntary and without incentives. Informed consent was obtained at the beginning of the survey. All data were collected, stored, and processed anonymously.

resultsOf the 230 experts contacted, 123 accessed the survey and 121 provided consent and completed the questionnaire, resulting in a response rate of 52.6%. The survey responses identified 13 statements that reached consensus (> 75% but ≤ 95% agreement) and five that reached strong consensus (> 95% agreement). These 18 statements were derived from 6 items addressing the topics of anatomical landmarks for tooth positioning, preferred distal implant position, preferred minimum implant diameter, preferred retention method, relevant patient-reported outcomes, and relevant clinician-reported outcomes.

conclusionThis study gathered valuable expert insights to inform a consensus development process for establishing clinical practice guidelines for management of the edentulous maxilla. The survey identified 18 statements from six items that reached consensus or strong consensus among survey respondents. The items not achieving consensus served to reflect real-world implant treatment strategies, identify literature gaps, and highlight any inconsistencies between expert consensus and current evidence.

Indexed as

Dental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedJaw, EdentulousMaxillaPractice Guidelines as TopicConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicHumansSurveys and Questionnairescomplete denturedental implantsimplant‐supported denturessurvey

Identifiers

PMID41732075
PMCPMC12930127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.