ArticleSociology of health & illness2026
Digital Futures in an Ageing Society: Frontline Perspectives on Sociotechnical Imaginaries in Swedish Eldercare.
Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article investigates how care professionals working with older adults in Sweden encounter, reproduce, and challenge sociotechnical imaginaries of a digitalised health and social care system. Drawing on interviews with 20 care professionals, we explore how promissory discourses that frame digitalisation as a solution to demographic and economic crises are taken up at the frontline of care. Despite regular experiences of technological malfunction and implementation challenges, care professionals maintain a persistent techno-optimism and techno-determinism in their narratives. We introduce the analytical concepts tech love goggles and the magic leap to explain how faith in digital futures is preserved amid present digital shortcomings and failures. Tech love goggles describes a tendency to idealise technology and deflect blame for its failures onto external factors, whereas the magic leap captures a future-oriented logic in which present obstacles are expected to dissolve over time. Our findings highlight the performative power of sociotechnical imaginaries and suggest that optimism towards digital technologies can obscure the immediate needs and constraints of both workers and older care recipients. We argue for greater attention to the ethical and practical implications of deferring care solutions to an idealised digital future, especially for those whose time horizons are limited by age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.