Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731984›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational science2026

Best Practices and Gaps in Current Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Real-World Evidence Policies for Medicines and Medical Devices: Current State of Play and Next Steps.

Katharine Cresswell, Ravinder Claire, Laila Issa, Luke Kubehl, Omnia Bilal, Rose Purcell, Amaya Clemente, Jakob Wested, Lotte Groth Jensen, Medha Sasane and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Katharine CresswellNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK.
Ravinder ClaireNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK.
Laila IssaSanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Luke KubehlJohnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Omnia BilalNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK.
Rose PurcellTakeda, Tokyo, Japan.
Amaya ClementeSanofi, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Jakob WestedUniversity of Copenhagen, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Lotte Groth JensenDefactum, Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands.
Medha SasaneSanofi, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Rita PeetersJohnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Bethany ShinkinsNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK.
Heather ColvinJohnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Funding

Innovative Health InitiativeNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-world data (RWD) offers a valuable opportunity to access vast information that can drive research and generate real-world evidence (RWE), offering insights into the actual delivery of care and patient outcomes beyond the limitations of traditional clinical trials. However, policy development has struggled to keep pace as decision-makers balance the potential benefits of RWE with lingering technical concerns about its limitations. To identify emerging best practices and policy gaps, the Integration of Heterogeneous Data and Evidence towards Regulatory and HTA Acceptance (IDERHA) team conducted a landscape review of current policy documents on the use of RWD and RWE in regulatory and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) decision-making for medicines and medical devices. The review report was released for public consultation in 2024. Our analysis highlights a growing body of knowledge on RWE, with increasing momentum towards developing standardized best practices. Despite notable progress in policy development over the past 5 years, broader acceptance and use of RWE in regulatory and HTA decision-making remain uneven and inconsistent. In the year since the original analysis was completed, there have been more policies released and finalized. Other researchers have conducted additional policy reviews and had similar findings as the IDHERA team. This underscores the importance of aligning expectations in the emerging field of RWE on appropriate research standardization, RWD utilization and laying the groundwork for further policy development. These efforts will contribute significantly to the dialogue on optimizing health data to improve patient care.

Indexed as

Equipment and SuppliesHealth PolicyPractice Guidelines as TopicTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalEvidence GapsHumansPolicy MakingUnited Stateshealth technology assessmentmedical devicesmedicinespolicyreal‐world datareal‐world evidenceregulatory harmonization

Identifiers

PMID41731984
PMCPMC12930001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.