Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731922›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2026

Diverse Forage Enhances the Antimicrobial Potency of Australian Honey.

Kenya E Fernandes, Andrew Dong, Jamie Ayton, Leanne Groves, Kerrie Graham, Peter Brooks, Nural Cokcetin, Dee A Carter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kenya E FernandesSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2912-4360
Andrew DongSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jamie AytonNSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Wagga, Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Leanne GrovesNSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Wagga, Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Kerrie GrahamNSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Wagga, Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter BrooksSchool of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.
Nural CokcetinSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Dee A CarterSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

New South Wales Bushfire Industry Recovery Package Sector Development BIP-SDG-135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a critical global health crisis, driving renewed interest in natural alternatives like honey. Australia's diverse native flora offers unique opportunities for producing bioactive honeys, yet their antimicrobial potential remains underexplored. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of Australian honeys from post-bushfire New South Wales landscapes and to identify key drivers of bioactivity and their therapeutic potential. Antimicrobial activity was assessed against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli using broth microdilution methods, measuring both total activity and non-peroxide activity. Comprehensive chemical profiling included bioactive compounds, quality parameters, sugars, organic acids, amino acids, volatiles, and secondary metabolites, assessed using standardized methodologies and ¹H-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy. Statistical analyses included correlation analysis, LASSO regression modeling, and principal component analysis. Most honeys exhibited strong antimicrobial activity, with 77% achieving MICs of ≤ 10% (w/w) against both pathogens, and 25% achieving ≤ 5% (w/w) against at least one pathogen. Honeys produced from mixed flora had consistently high levels of antibacterial activity, while monofloral honeys were much more variable. H

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsEscherichia coliHoneyStaphylococcus aureusAnimalsAustraliaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNew South WalesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantimicrobial activityApis melliferaAustralian honeynatural products

Identifiers

PMID41731922
PMCPMC12929673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.