Observational studyMedicine2026
The timing of arterial thrombectomy on neurological recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arterial thrombectomy (AT) is a cornerstone in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion. However, the optimal therapeutic time window and the best management strategy for patients presenting beyond the conventional 4.5-hour timeframe remain areas of active investigation and debate. This retrospective cohort study aimed to analyze the effect of timing of AT on recovery in AIS. We retrospectively analyzed 117 AIS patients admitted between January 2021 and January 2023. Participants were categorized into 3 groups: early AT (onset-to-AT < 4.5 hours), late AT (onset-to-AT ≥ 4.5 hours), and late AT + intravenous thrombolysis (IT). Outcomes compared included clinical efficacy, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, serum levels of neurotrophic factors, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, residual stenosis, vessel reocclusion, 3-month mortality, and 1-month complications. The total effective rate was higher in the early AT and late AT + IT groups than in the late AT group. Pretreatment NIHSS scores and serum neurological marker levels were comparable across all groups. After treatment, the early AT and late AT + IT groups showed significantly lower NIHSS scores, higher serum levels of neurological markers, and improved treatment efficiency compared to the late AT group. Prognosis-related markers also indicated better outcomes in these 2 groups. Additionally, complications such as mucocutaneous ecchymosis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial bleeding were significantly reduced in the early AT and late AT + IT groups. AT within 4.5 hours of stroke onset improves efficacy, reduces neurological injury, and decreases complications. For patients presenting beyond 4.5 hours, combining AT with IT achieves comparable therapeutic benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.