ArticleMedicine2026
Evaluation of the usability of YouTube videos as educational materials in improving patients' metered dose inhaler use skills: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the quality, reliability, and content of YouTube videos related to the use technique of metered dose inhalers (MDIs). Considering the increasing use of digital platforms for health education, it is important to evaluate the accuracy and educational value of such online resources. This descriptive and cross-sectional study evaluated 377 YouTube videos retrieved through a systematic search. The video selection process was monitored using the PRISMA flow diagram according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The videos' content, quality, and reliability were assessed using the Modified DISCERN tool, Global Quality Scale, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool, and a checklist containing MDI use steps. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine associations between evaluation scores and video characteristics. A total of 12 YouTube videos on MDI use were analyzed. Of these, 33.3% were uploaded in 2022, and 66.7% were produced by associations or unions in the health sector. The mean interaction index was 0.53 ± 0.32, and the Video Power Index was 0.08 ± 0.15. The mean reliability level of the videos was 2.91 ± 0.75, quality level 4.16 ± 0.76, understandability level 80.83 ± 18.75, actionability level 81.66 ± 18.16, information level 77.00 ± 15.06, and information accuracy level 76.25 ± 15.80. YouTube videos on MDI use were largely adequate in terms of content but demonstrated some deficiencies in reliability. It is recommended that digital health information be produced under professional supervision and in collaboration with health authorities to ensure accuracy and trustworthiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.