ArticleMedicine2026
Efficacy of biomechanics-based core muscle training in patients with postpartum stress urinary incontinence.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postpartum stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a frequent pelvic floor disorder caused by pregnancy- and delivery-related neuromuscular injury, leading to urine leakage during exertion. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining biomechanics-based core training with standard PFMT in postpartum women with SUI. This retrospective study included 178 patients with postpartum SUI treated between May 2021 and May 2025. Based on the rehabilitation protocol, patients were divided into a control group receiving conventional PFMT and an observation group receiving additional biomechanics-based core training. Primary outcomes were changes in the 1-hour pad test and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). Secondary measures included pelvic floor strength assessed by the modified Oxford scale and safety evaluation. Statistical comparisons were performed using paired and independent-samples t-tests and chi-square tests. Both groups showed significant posttreatment improvement, with greater benefits in the observation group. The 1-hour pad test decreased from 17.9 ± 7.1 g to 8.7 ± 5.9 g versus 18.7 ± 7.5 g to 12.9 ± 6.5 g in controls (P < .001). ICIQ-UI SF scores declined by 6.8 versus 4.1 points (P < .001). The rate of ≥50% urine loss reduction was higher in the observation group (70.0% vs 46.6%; RR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.16-1.95; P = .002). Modified Oxford scale improvement was also greater (+1.60 vs +0.90; P < .001). No serious adverse events occurred. Biomechanics-based core training significantly improved urinary continence, pelvic floor strength, and quality of life without increasing adverse events, suggesting it is a safe and effective adjunct to conventional PFMT for postpartum rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.