Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731793›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2026

Effectiveness of low-dye taping in the treatment of patients with plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liyue Zhang, Li Chen, Xiong Zhang, Jinli Chen, Yuan Luo

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liyue ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation, The First People's Hospital of Neijiang City, Sichuan, China.
Li Chen
Xiong Zhang
Jinli Chen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of low-dye taping in the treatment of plantar fasciitis (PF) through a meta-analysis.

methodsTwo researchers conducted an independent electronic literature search to evaluate the outcomes of low-dye application in the treatment of PF. Electronic databases included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from November 2024, limited to English, and search terms included "tape," "athletic tape," "taping," "low-dye taping," "fasciitis, plantar," "policeman's heel," "heel, policeman's," "heels, policeman's," "policeman's heel," "policeman's heels," "plantar fasciitis," "heel spur syndrome," "fasciitis, plantar, chronic," and "plantar fasciitis, chronic." Inclusion criteria were visual analog scale or numeric rating scale pain scores. Data were extracted and meta-analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software.

resultsEleven trials were included, all being randomized controlled trials. The results showed that, compared with the control group, the effect of low-dye ligation on the management of pain after PF surgery was better than that of the control group (mean difference = -1.24, 95% confidence interval [-2.39, -0.08], P = .04), with a statistical difference.

conclusionCompared with placebo, low-dye can effectively improve pain and quality of life in patients with PF but has no advantages over other treatments. Low-dye is beneficial as an adjunctive therapy for PF, but the number of articles included in this systematic review is limited, and of variable quality, very high-quality, large-sample, multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm this.

Indexed as

Athletic TapeColoring AgentsFasciitis, PlantarHumansPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeColoring Agentslow-dye tapingmeta-analysispainplantar fasciitissystematic evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41731793
PMCPMC12928950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.