ArticleMedicine2026
Development and clinical evaluation of an ultrasound-based predictive model for early diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early-stage endometrial cancer frequently shares overlapping clinical presentations and sonographic features with benign endometrial disorders, making early detection challenging. This retrospective study evaluated clinical characteristics, symptom profiles, and ultrasonographic parameters in patients with endometrial lesions who underwent standardized transvaginal ultrasound and histopathological confirmation. A total of 257 patients were included, of whom 189 had benign endometrial lesions and 68 were diagnosed with early-stage endometrial cancer. Univariate analyses demonstrated significant differences between groups in age, body mass index, hemoglobin levels, reproductive status, symptom patterns, and multiple ultrasound features, particularly endometrial thickness, endometrial-myometrial junction integrity, vascular density, and vascular distribution. Variables showing statistical significance were incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression model, which identified age, postmenopausal status, abnormal uterine bleeding, endometrial thickness ≥12 mm, disruption of the endometrial-myometrial junction, moderate to marked vascularity, and central or mixed vascular distribution as independent predictors of early-stage malignancy. The resulting predictive model demonstrated excellent discrimination, yielding an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.902 (95% confidence interval: 0.860-0.944), with 84.3% sensitivity and 82.0% specificity at the optimal cutoff. These findings highlight the value of integrating clinical and ultrasound-derived indicators to improve early risk stratification and support timely diagnostic decision-making in patients with suspected endometrial cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.