ArticleMedicine2026
Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by sintilimab in a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleSintilimab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, enhances T-cell responses, leading to robust antitumor activity, and is approved for the treatment of lung cancer. While immune checkpoint inhibitors offer substantial clinical benefits, they are often associated with immune-related adverse events, particularly cutaneous toxicities. These skin reactions typically manifest as mild maculopapular rashes; however, more severe manifestations, such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), can occur. Both SJS and TEN are life-threatening conditions with high mortality rates. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient in this case is a 68-year-old male diagnosed with stage IVA non-small cell lung cancer, who has no detectable oncogenic mutations. He was treated with sintilimab (200 mg), pemetrexed disodium (500 mg/m2), and cisplatin (75 mg/m2). Following the third cycle of therapy, he developed widespread skin blisters, localized necrosis, and severe pain on the second day. DIAGNOSES: The patient's symptoms - widespread skin blisters, localized necrosis, and severe pain - were indicative of SJS and TEN, which are immune-related cutaneous toxicities triggered by immunotherapy.
interventionsImmediate interventions were initiated, which included systemic corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory treatments, fluid replacement, and appropriate skin care measures. OUTCOMES: These interventions led to significant improvement in the immunotherapy-related dermatologic toxicity experienced by the patient. LESSONS: This case underscores the importance for clinicians to remain vigilant regarding severe cutaneous toxicities such as SJS and TEN in patients undergoing sintilimab-based therapy. Prompt recognition and intervention are essential to mitigate the risks associated with these potentially life-threatening conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.