Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731773›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

Development of a forensic evidence preservation protocol for military emergency departments: A methodological study.

Seonyul Jeong, Myung Kyung Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seonyul JeongArmed Forces Trauma Center, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Myung Kyung LeeCollege of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Innovation, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2999-2299

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To become a trusted military hospital and facilitate development alongside the establishment of the National Trauma Center, accurate investigations into various incidents are crucial for uncovering the truth. This study aims to develop standardized and systematic guidelines for preserving forensic discipline for patients who visit the emergency department of the Armed Forces Hospital. This methodological developmental study involved protocol development based on a literature review and expert validation. Key incident types required for developing the forensic evidence preservation protocol were identified. A preliminary protocol was drafted by reviewing 15 literature sources, and each item was validated by a panel of 10 forensic experts. Items with a content validity index of ≥ 0.8 were selected, while those with a content validity index of < 0.8 were revised or excluded. Clinical applicability was then evaluated by 10 intended end-users. The final protocol comprised 37 items and was tailored for implementation in the military hospital emergency department. The events required for protocol development in military hospitals included gunshot wounds, explosions, sharp force trauma, and traffic-related accidents. The completed protocol consisted of 37 items and was structured into 3 stages: before patient arrival, upon patient arrival, and during evidence transfer to the investigative agency. The developed evidence preservation protocol will help emergency department personnel with limited forensic expertise in contributing to military police investigations. It enhances the role of military medical institutions by strengthening their capabilities and aligning them with broader efforts to advance military trauma care systems.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalForensic MedicineHospitals, MilitaryHumansarmed forces hospitalevidence collecting protocolevidence preservation

Identifiers

PMID41731773
PMCPMC12928957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.