ArticleMedicine2026
Machine learning-based prediction of activities of daily living in patients with stroke and other acquired brain injuries.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In rehabilitation research, machine learning (ML) algorithms are being increasingly applied to predict the ability of patients with stroke and other acquired brain injuries to perform activities of daily living (ADL). However, many previous studies have relied on complex data, such as imaging or blood tests, which require advanced equipment and specialized expertise and are difficult to apply in general clinical settings. We aimed to predict ADL independence in patients with stroke and other acquired brain injuries at the start of rehabilitation using routine assessment data. This retrospective study involved 379 patients with stroke or other acquired brain injuries who received rehabilitation at our hospital between September 2008 and August 2022. Three ML models - support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM) - were used to classify Functional Independence Measure scores. Predictors included age, sex, Japan Coma Scale score, and Brunnstrom recovery stage. All models performed above chance, with SVM achieving the highest F1 score (0.862), followed by RF (0.857) and LightGBM (0.838). Analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of the classifier on performance (P < .001), with SVM and RF significantly outperforming LightGBM. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis identified lower- and upper-limb Brunnstrom recovery stage, impaired consciousness, and age as key predictive features. ML algorithms can accurately predict ADL independence using initial rehabilitation assessment data without reliance on advanced medical technologies. The use of these algorithms may enhance clinical decision-making, and they may be particularly valuable in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.