ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Moisture-Responsive Friction Adaptability: Rethinking the Conventional Skin Silicone Interfaces in Pressure Injury Prevention Dressing Designs.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modelling and Simulation of Soft Tissue Loading Reduction at the Posterior Heel by a Moisture-Responsive Prophylactic Dressing.International wound journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the frictional properties of the skin-contact interfaces of two multilayer prophylactic dressings under simulated perspiration conditions. The tested dressings were identical except for the skin-contact interface, which was either silicone-made or Hydrofiber-made, that is, AQUACEL Hydrofiber Technology. Using a standardised tribological 'sled test' setup and a skin-mimicking polymer substrate, we measured the static and kinetic coefficients of friction for each dressing interface type at varying moisture levels. The dressing with the Hydrofiber interface consistently demonstrated significantly lower static and kinetic coefficients of friction compared to the silicone-based dressing, across all moisture conditions. The Hydrofiber interface exhibited a sharp coefficient of friction reduction with minimal (5%) moisture accumulation, mimicking overnight perspiration under thermoneutral conditions. This dressing maintained the low coefficient of friction levels at a steady level of approximately 0.2 until full saturation. In contrast, the silicone interface retained high (> 1) coefficients of friction regardless of moisture. These findings highlight an important biomechanical advantage of Hydrofiber skin-contact materials in reducing frictional forces at the skin-dressing interface, especially in moisture-prone body areas, in a pressure injury prevention context. Friction-responsive skin-contacting dressing materials with low coefficients of friction, which remain low while they become moist due to perspiration accumulation, should be preferred for preventative dressings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.