Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731642›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026

Using group concept mapping to co-create a research agenda with the homeless community in Rhode Island.

Megan Smith, Elizabeth Goulart, David Araujo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megan SmithRhode Island College, Providence, RI, USA. msmith4@ric.edu.
Elizabeth GoulartRhode Island College, Providence, RI, USA.
David AraujoRhode Island College, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

Rhode Island College Committee for Faculty Scholarship - Grant #80001142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHomelessness is indisputably a pressing social concern in the United States today, with deleterious impacts on both individual and population health. However, policy development often excludes the voices of those directly affected, leading to strategies that fail to meet their needs. This study was grounded in the principle that people experiencing a phenomenon have the clearest view of its causes and solutions. We used a community-based participatory research design, group concept mapping, to partner with the homeless community in Rhode Island to understand what is needed to effectively address this crisis.

methodsPeople with current or recent experiences of homelessness were eligible to participate, and recruitment occurred primarily by word-of-mouth between partners (participants) and their peers. The research involved 43 partners in step one, where they responded to an open-ended prompt, “When we understand ______ better, the homelessness crisis will be better,” to generate 25 statements. In step two, 50 partners sorted these statements based on similarity and rated them on a scale of 1 (not at all important) to 4 (very important). The data were analyzed using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis to visualize the interconnections and group the statements. The research team reached consensus on a five-cluster solution.

resultsThe five core clusters were: immediate and basic needs (average rating 3.66), longer-term needs (3.48), interactions with authority (3.45), core factors of well-being (3.11), and the social experience of homelessness (3.11). The single highest-rated topic was housing availability, affordability, and stability (3.93). Crucially, partners conceptually grouped mental health and substance use care within the interactions with authority cluster, suggesting that behavioral health services are often mandated rather than voluntarily sought in the community.

conclusionsThis study confirms that community-based participatory research is feasible and effective in developing a research and action roadmap with people experiencing unsheltered homelessness. The results suggest the necessity of adapting healthcare and social service systems to be more responsive to the needs of the homeless community, including by emphasizing the importance of voluntary treatment models. The process centered partners’ perspectives, validating their lived expertise and inviting their continued collaboration in future research.

Identifiers

PMID41731642
PMCPMC13032388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.