ArticleJournal of ovarian research2026
Machine learning-based endometrial ultrasound radiomics habitat analysis for predicting pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning-enabled prediction of ART pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredicting in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes is crucial for individualized decision-making. However, due to complex interactions among multiple factors, accurate manual integration and assessment are challenging. This study aims to develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for predicting the probability of clinical pregnancy after fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
methodsThis retrospective study included infertile patients undergoing fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer between December 2023 and June 2025. Endometrial regions of interest (ROIs) were manually segmented on mid-sagittal uterine ultrasound images. The K-means clustering algorithm was employed to partition the ROIs into habitat subregions. Radiomic features were extracted from the entire ROI and each subregion. After feature selection using Mann–Whitney U tests, Pearson correlation, and mRMR, 11 machine learning algorithms were trained in combination with clinically independent predictors. Model hyperparameters were optimized through five-fold stratified cross-validation and grid search. The optimal classifier was selected based on performance evaluation to construct the final predictive model, subsequently validated on an independent test set. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) provided model interpretability.
resultsThis study included 543 patients, randomly divided into a training cohort of 380 and a test cohort of 163. ROIs were subdivided into four habitat subregions. Imaging features were systematically extracted from the entire ROI and each subregion. Following mRMR, 15 habitat subregion features were incorporated into the model. Based on area under the ROC curve, the ExtraTrees model demonstrated optimal predictive performance on the test set (AUC: 0.766; 95% CI: 0.689–0.830; accuracy: 0.699; sensitivity: 73.9%; specificity: 65.3%; F1 score: 0.726). SHAP analysis confirmed the significant contribution of embryo type and higher-order texture features from specific subregions to model prediction.
conclusionA habitat-based radiomics machine learning model integrating endometrial ultrasound features and clinical data effectively predicted clinical pregnancy outcomes following embryo transfer. This approach offers a non-invasive, interpretable tool with potential to support personalized embryo transfer strategies in assisted reproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.