ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Development of an adapted glossary of implementation strategies for supporting behavioral health program uptake in faith-based communities.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Addressing a gap in community-engaged research: reporting results of congregations' implementation capacity assessment to research participants.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFormal compilations of implementation strategies like the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC; 1) are relevant for planning and evaluating implementation initiatives. The relationship between these strategies and the particulars of a specific initiative is not always clear, particularly when implementation occurs outside of organized healthcare settings. The present study reports on the process used to develop an adapted glossary of ERIC strategies for implementing evidence-based health promotion programs in African American churches.
methodsA glossary adaptation team composed of academics and community representatives met twice a month for six months to adapt implementation strategy definitions to fit the context of the present project. Collaborative discussions were held until consensus was reached for each strategy. This project-adapted glossary was then subjected to coding to document the types of changes that occurred during the adaptation process.
resultsThe glossary adaptation team collectively dedicated 99.5 person-hours to the meetings to obtain consensus for the strategies. The final strategy glossary retained 64 strategies relevant to the project, with 84.4% of strategies involving some level of adaptation. Most of the adaptation involved specifying project-specific actors, specifying that the innovation involved evidence-based health promotion programs, and noting the role the project's technical assistance team serves in supporting congregations during implementation.
conclusionsAdapting implementation strategy definitions to a specific project is a time-intensive process that challenges a team to carefully and creatively consider how strategies may be enacted in a specific context (e.g., faith-based communities). The consensus-based process also served as a type of cultural exchange between the project's academic partners, community partners, and consultants. The development of a project-specific glossary leverages the ability of project team members to employ implementation strategies as part of project planning and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.