Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731583›Full record

Trial reportReproductive health2026

Light color temperature on stress, anxiety and well-being in high-risk pregnant women during the non-stress test: a randomized controlled trial.

Emine Yıldırım, Filiz Polat

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06736873 (Effect of Light Color on Stress, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-being During Nonstress Test in Pregnant Women at Risk), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06736873 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Effect of Light Color on Stress, Anxiety, and Psychological Well-being During Nonstress Test in Pregnant Women at Risk: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOsmaniye Korkut Ata UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsPregnant Women, Stress, LightArmsLight intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emine YıldırımDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, 80010, Turkey. eminekucukyildirim@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0207-114X
Filiz PolatDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, 80010, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8326-9504

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased frequency of fetal health assessment methods and uncertainties about their results cause high-risk pregnant women to experience increased stress and anxiety. This study aims to determine the effect of light color temperature on stress, anxiety and psychological well-being in high-risk pregnant women undergoing a non-stress test (NST).

methodsThis randomized controlled experimental study included 100 high-risk pregnant women. The trial protocol was registered (Clinical trial number: NCT06736873, date: 12/05/2024). Data were collected through the Personal Information Form, the Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The high-risk pregnant women in the intervention group underwent the non-stress test after the light color temperature was adjusted to medium-warm white.

resultsSignificant improvements were observed between the intervention group’s PSS pre-test (32.16 ± 5.75) and post-test (27.12 ± 6.65), PWBS pre-test (26.78 ± 2.13) and post-test (28.46 ± 3.11), and STAI pre-test (58.62 ± 1.30) and post-test (51.60 ± 3.11) mean scores (p < 0.05). As to the control group, while the differences between the STAI pre-test (58.46 ± 1.24) and post-test (58.54 ± 1.41) and PWBS pre-test (26.96 ± 2.45) and post-test (26.84 ± 2.41) mean scores were significant (p < 0.05), the difference between the PSS pre-test (30.98 ± 5.75) and post-test (30.88 ± 5.75) mean scores was not significant (p > 0.05).

conclusionsThis study indicates that in the intervention group, the use of light color temperature during the NST reduced stress and anxiety levels and enhanced psychological well-being levels in high-risk pregnant women. While the pre-post differences in the control group were not significant for the Perceived Stress Scale, they were significant for Psychological Well-Being and Anxiety, albeit with a minimal or unfavorable magnitude of change. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT06736873 (Date: 12/05/2024).

Indexed as

AnxietyPregnancy, High-RiskPregnant PeopleStress, PsychologicalTemperatureAdultColorFemaleHumansPregnancyPsychological Well-BeingSubjective StressAnxietyHigh-risk pregnant womenLight colorPsychological well-beingStress

Identifiers

PMID41731583
PMCPMC12930844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.