Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731574›Full record

ReviewAdvances in simulation (London, England)2026

Pre-roling: an operational framework for facilitators and simulating participants (SPs) to prepare for both acting and educating safely.

Casper Danholt Iuul, Peter Dieckmann, Birgitte Bruun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Casper Danholt IuulDepartment of Communication, Center for Tracking & Society (CTS), University of Copenhagen, Karen Blixens Plads 8, Copenhagen, 2300, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4993-0831
Peter DieckmannDepartment of Engineering Technology and Didactics, Strategy & Leadership Development, Danish Technical University (DTU), Lautrupvang 15, Ballerup, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6945-7058
Birgitte BruunCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, opg. 1, etage 25, Herlev, DK-2730, Denmark. birgitte.bruun@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1817-6023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sometimes scenario-based simulations do not go as expected because facilitator and simulating participant (SP) are not sufficiently aligned. This innovation paper presents a pre-roling framework that offers an operational, theoretically informed tool for facilitators and SPs to prepare systematically for scenario-based simulations in health professions education. The framework development was based on four months of ethnographic fieldwork at the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) and informed by action theory.The pre-roling framework guides facilitators and SPs through five analytically distinct aspects of simulation performance — meaning (educational purpose), narrative (intended course of events), style (tone, tempo), character (the portrayed person), and health professions education (clinical picture, learning environment, task distribution, and care for the SP). Facilitators hold primary responsibility for meaning, narrative and style, while SPs hold primary responsibility for the character, with explicit collaboration across all domains.The framework and its accompanying pocket card and worksheet were iteratively refined in dialogue with SPs, course leaders and scenario designers. It is intended as a flexible, context-sensitive preparation tool that can be used symmetrically by SPs and facilitators, from novice to experienced, and in diverse simulation settings. It fills a previously unoccupied space between general guidelines and the moment of action by systematizing preparation without prescribing content, thereby supporting clearer alignment, more deliberate improvisation, and explicit attention to SP safety. Using the framework can reduce dissonance between SPs and facilitators, enhance the coherence of dramaturgical and educational intentions, improve learners’ experiential learning opportunities, and help prevent distress among SPs.

Indexed as

Action theoryEthnographyFieldworkMedical educationSimulation

Identifiers

PMID41731574
PMCPMC13040827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.