ReviewAdvances in simulation (London, England)2026
Pre-roling: an operational framework for facilitators and simulating participants (SPs) to prepare for both acting and educating safely.
Review in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sometimes scenario-based simulations do not go as expected because facilitator and simulating participant (SP) are not sufficiently aligned. This innovation paper presents a pre-roling framework that offers an operational, theoretically informed tool for facilitators and SPs to prepare systematically for scenario-based simulations in health professions education. The framework development was based on four months of ethnographic fieldwork at the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) and informed by action theory.The pre-roling framework guides facilitators and SPs through five analytically distinct aspects of simulation performance — meaning (educational purpose), narrative (intended course of events), style (tone, tempo), character (the portrayed person), and health professions education (clinical picture, learning environment, task distribution, and care for the SP). Facilitators hold primary responsibility for meaning, narrative and style, while SPs hold primary responsibility for the character, with explicit collaboration across all domains.The framework and its accompanying pocket card and worksheet were iteratively refined in dialogue with SPs, course leaders and scenario designers. It is intended as a flexible, context-sensitive preparation tool that can be used symmetrically by SPs and facilitators, from novice to experienced, and in diverse simulation settings. It fills a previously unoccupied space between general guidelines and the moment of action by systematizing preparation without prescribing content, thereby supporting clearer alignment, more deliberate improvisation, and explicit attention to SP safety. Using the framework can reduce dissonance between SPs and facilitators, enhance the coherence of dramaturgical and educational intentions, improve learners’ experiential learning opportunities, and help prevent distress among SPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.