ArticleCritical care (London, England)2026
Association of propofol vs. sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia with postoperative delirium, cognitive decline, and mortality in older adults: a global comparative-effectiveness study.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Propofol versus sevoflurane: how many RCTs is enough?Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative delirium and longer-term neurocognitive disorders are major complications of surgery in older adults. As surgical volumes rise in ageing populations, identifying modifiable intraoperative factors—particularly anesthetic choice—has become increasingly important. Propofol is often favoured for its recovery profile, whereas sevoflurane offers organ-protective preconditioning that may benefit vulnerable patients. Comparative evidence in high-risk real-world populations remains limited.
methodsWe performed a multicentre retrospective comparative-effectiveness study using a global federated health network. Adults aged 60–80 year undergoing surgery with general anesthesia were included if they received propofol or sevoflurane for maintenance. Propensity-score matching (1:1) and doubly robust Cox models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). The primary outcome was postoperative delirium; secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction (180–365 days), and long-term mortality. Sensitivity analyses incorporated antipsychotic-based delirium ascertainment and time-stratified hazards.
resultsAfter matching, 91,046 patients were included (propofol 45,545; sevoflurane 45,545). Propofol was associated with higher risks of postoperative delirium (3.36% vs. 2.70%; aHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.25–1.48) and 30-day mortality (0.66% vs. 0.53%; aHR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05–1.48), with the greatest excess on postoperative day 1 (aHR 2.58). Long-term cognitive dysfunction (aHR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09–1.24) and long-term mortality (aHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.17–1.29) were also increased.
conclusionsIn this large real-world cohort, propofol maintenance anesthesia was associated with higher risks of postoperative delirium, long-term cognitive decline, and mortality compared with sevoflurane, particularly in physiologically vulnerable patients. These findings generate hypotheses regarding anesthetic choice in high-risk older adults and support the need for adequately powered randomized trials. Limitations include potential outcome under-ascertainment, lack of intraoperative physiologic data, and residual confounding inherent to electronic health records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.