Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731547›Full record

ReviewBMC medicine2026

Classification of ALS molecular subtypes: a literature review on machine learning applications and their clinical value.

John K Jammal, Esteban A Gomez, Ammar Al-Chalabi, Alfredo Iacoangeli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John K JammalDepartment of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AB, UK.
Esteban A GomezDepartment of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AB, UK.
Ammar Al-ChalabiDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 5 Cutcombe Rd, London, SE5 9RX, UK.
Alfredo IacoangeliDepartment of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AB, UK. alfredo.iacoangeli@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

European Research Council 772376-EScORIAL(NIHR) National Institute for Health and Care Research FP7/2007–2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterised by considerable heterogeneity in both its underlying biological mechanisms and clinical presentation. High-dimensional transcriptomic datasets offer an opportunity to characterise this variation at the molecular level; however, traditional statistical methods struggle with their scale and complexity. MAIN BODY: Machine learning approaches can reduce dimensionality and uncover latent patterns, enabling the identification of molecular subtypes that may refine prognosis and support patient stratification. Recent transcriptomic studies employing unsupervised machine learning have identified ALS subtypes with distinct molecular and clinical characteristics. Redefining ALS into more homogeneous molecular and clinical subtypes could transform all areas of ALS research by supporting novel experimental designs and precision medicine approaches.

conclusionsIn this review, we summarise and critically assess these studies, discussing their findings, strengths, and limitations, and highlighting research gaps and challenges that must be addressed to enable their translation into biomedical and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisMachine LearningHumansPrecision MedicineAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisGlial cell activationMachine learningMolecular subtypesOxidative stressPrecision medicineTranscription dysregulationTransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID41731547
PMCPMC13037183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.