Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731533›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Attitudes toward statistics: relationship with nursing students' attitudes toward evidence-based nursing and research anxiety.

Öznur Erbay Dallı

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Öznur Erbay DallıDepartment of Internal Medicine Nursing, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Health Sciences, Nilüfer, Bursa, 16059, Türkiye. oznurerbay@uludag.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2282-0846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe statistical course, which plays an integral role in the curriculum of nursing programs, is often perceived as challenging by students. This may negatively affect students’ attitudes and ability to engage in evidence-based practices and scientific research, where statistics are crucial. The purpose of the study was to examine nursing students’ attitudes toward statistics (ATS), explore its relationship with attitudes toward evidence-based nursing (EBN) and research anxiety (RA), and identify the factors influencing it.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted with 288 undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the second, third, and fourth years of a nursing program at a university, using a convenience sampling method. Data were collected using the Nursing Student Characteristics Form, the Survey of Attitudes Towards Statistics (SATS), the Evidence-Based Nursing Attitude Questionnaire (EBNAQ), and the Research Anxiety Scale (RAS). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis.

resultsThe mean scores were 152.15 ± 29.04 for SATS (range: 36–252) and 48.69 ± 8.74 for EBNAQ (range: 15–75), with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes, and 30.11 ± 9.25 for RAS (range: 12–60), with higher scores indicating higher anxiety. ATS showed a moderate positive correlation with attitudes toward EBN (r = 0.402, p = 0.001) and a moderate negative correlation with RA (r = −0.546, p = 0.001). In the multiple linear regression analysis, prior interest in mathematics/statistics, participation in scientific meetings/events, and participation in a training/course on conducting scientific research were positively associated with ATS, whereas perceived difficulty in the statistics course and higher RA were negatively associated with ATS.

conclusionsThe results underscore the relevance of ATS within nursing education, particularly in relation to EBN and research-related experiences. Educational and experiential factors linked to statistics learning should therefore be taken into account in nursing programs. Collaboration between nursing educators and statistics instructors may help address students’ challenges and support a more accessible and student-centered approach to statistics education.

trial registrationNot applicable. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Evidence-based practicesNursingNursing researchStatisticsStudent

Identifiers

PMID41731533
PMCPMC13037043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.