ArticleBMC medicine2026
Patient-centred postpartum care provision: virtual delivery, tiered escalation, and tensions between efficiency, preference, and clinical concern.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGood quality postnatal care is of key importance for maternal and infant health. During the pandemic, healthcare services were reconfigured with increased virtual delivery, reducing infection transmission risk for pregnant women, new mothers, newborn babies, and healthcare workers. Post-pandemic, this shift of maternity care from face-to-face towards virtual care provision has persisted. Whilst some have extolled this trend, the evidence is mixed, both for clinical outcomes and for patient perceptions and experiences. We sought to explore the experiences and perceptions of women affected by these changes, to inform ongoing maternity services development.
methodsThis study reports responses of women participating in the COVID Symptom Study Biobank, drawn from the King's College London/ZOE COVID Symptom Study, representing a convenience sample of UK women of reproductive age (18-50 years). Participants were invited to complete an online questionnaire, from 7 September to 1 December 2021. Demographic analyses are presented for all respondents. Content analysis was used to analyse all free-text responses.
resultsOverall, 1036 respondents delivered at least one live baby during the pandemic, of whom 821 respondents provided a total of 1466 qualitative responses about their care in-person (n = 550 responses), by video (n = 125), or by telephone (n = 791). Mothers liked the convenience and promptness of virtual care, and generally felt it was a good way to meet their healthcare needs, with two caveats: First, they appreciated the option to escalate care quickly (i.e. a tiered process), which seemed to occur with little difficulty in most cases; second, they perceived physical examination as very important in certain circumstances, particularly when a baby was unwell.
conclusionsOur findings show women are pragmatic and reasonable about the benefits and risks of differing modes of postpartum care delivery, including virtual care. Our study supports a tiered approach to the provision of postnatal care, which balances perceived efficiencies, preferences of the individual seeking care, and level of clinical concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.