ArticleBMC medical education2026
Assessing differences in physician associate/assistant program admissions: observing the influence of demographic characteristics on likelihood of acceptance.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient and clinician racial concordance has been shown to improve therapeutic trust and health outcomes. Like other health professions, the Physician Associate/Assistant (PA) profession has struggled to improve the diversity of the profession compared to the United States population. By analyzing the applicant pool from application to acceptance, this study aimed to apply a novel assessment methodology to evaluate the association between admissions policies and procedures and the diversity of the PA entering class.
methodsDe-identified demographic and academic performance data were culled from 2022 to 2023 admissions applications to the George Washington University PA program from the Centralized Application Service for Physician Assistants (CASPA). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize applicants. Logistic regression models were used to identify applicant characteristics associated with the odds of being interviewed and/or accepted.
resultsA total of 2518 applications were analyzed, describing 8% of the CASPA applicant pool from 2022 to 2023. Bivariate analysis showed that race/ethnicity and overall GPA were significant predictors of being interviewed (G2(4) = 18.92, p < 0.001; OR = 1.66, 95% CI [1.54, 1.79]) and being accepted (G2(4) = 11.29, p = 0.02; OR = 1.41, 95% CI [1.26, 1.59]). Prior to controlling for covariates, Black applicants showed significantly lower odds of being accepted into the PA program compared to their White counterparts. After adjusting for overall GPA, the association between race/ethnicity and the odds of interview and acceptance became non-significant. Overall GPA remained strongly associated with odds of interview and acceptance after controlling for other covariates. Strong associations between Asian, Black and Hispanic applicants and the following backgrounds: (1) first-generation college student, (2) living in a health professions shortage area, (3) school district where 50% or less attend college and (4) economically disadvantaged family income were identified when compared to White students.
conclusionsThis study proposes a unique method for evaluating the effects of admissions policies on accepted students from diverse backgrounds. Given some student background factors are associated with race/ethnicity, they may be useful to healthcare educational programs during the admissions cycle to facilitate increasing the diversity of the PA student body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.