Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41731514›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

Investigation of university students' oral health attitudes, behaviors, and habits: a cross-sectional study.

Muhammet Fidan, Mustafa Fidan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammet FidanDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Usak University, Usak, 64200, Türkiye. muhammet.fidan@usak.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0001-7869-4872
Mustafa FidanEducational Sciences, Faculty of Education, Bartin University, Bartin, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7461-4994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeveloping positive attitudes toward oral health is critical for improving general health and hygiene. This study aimed to examine the relationship between university students’ oral health attitudes, behaviors, and habits.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Turkey using convenience sampling. The Oral Health Attitude Scale (OHA-S) was applied alongside questions on socio-demographic factors and oral health attitudes and behaviors, including oral hygiene habits such as tooth brushing, flossing, dental visits and and toothbrush replacement frequencies. The data were analyzed using independent sample t-tests and one-way ANOVA (p < .05).

resultsDuring the 2023–2024 academic year, a total of 596 university students (407 females and 189 males) participated in the study. The mean age of university students was 20.2 ± 1.67. The mean total OHA-S scores ranged from 151 to 174 according to categories, within the theoretical range of 41–205. Higher OHA-S scores were associated with frequent tooth brushing (≥ 2 times/day), regular flossing, routine dental visits, and timely toothbrush replacement (all p < .05), while smoking was linked to significantly lower scores (p < .001).

conclusionUniversity students with more positive oral health attitudes demonstrated healthier oral hygiene practices, whereas smoking negatively affected attitudes. These findings highlight the importance of preventive oral health education and the value of multidimensional assessment tools such as the OHA-S.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeOral HealthOral HygieneStudentsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesToothbrushingTurkeyUniversitiesAttitudeDental careOral hygieneSmokingStudents

Identifiers

PMID41731514
PMCPMC13037090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.